Exchanges are a way to force businesses to offer health insurance coverage for their employees. They are also a way to enforce a requirement that everyone purchase health insurance without looking like they were forcing individual consumers to crawl up to the doorstep of an industry that Obamacare proponents have repeatedly demonized.
Health Insurance Exchanges are a bad idea, and Alaska should refuse to set one up. Alaska Policy Forum’s Jeremy Thompson and David Boyle interview Cato Institute’s Michael Cannon who explains why.
Michael Cannon concisely answers several questions about the new federal health care law.
APF explores some responses from people who may favor of the State of Alaska building an Obamacare Exchange.
How can the state stop the federal government from imposing penalties on private businesses, health plans, churches, and religious groups for refusing to pay for services that violate their conscience?
(New England Journal of Medicine) Massachusetts was the first state to enact near-universal health care coverage in 2006. Since then, premiums have increased and employment in the health care occupations (excluding nurses) and […]
Health care reform was proposed as a way to cut rising health care costs. The Medicare actuary says it isn’t going to work.
Alaska has made significant investments in the infrastructure needed for Electronic Health Records, but will EHR’s deliver on the grand promises made? Some are skeptical.
Obamacare requires states to establish “exchanges” to limit the health-insurance choices of many of their residents. This idea will not work in Alaska.
Grace-Marie Turner thinks the Health Care Reform legislation passed earlier this year is unraveling. Here are her reasons why.